|
This collection of essays is based on a September 1993 conference at
the University of Cape Town that concerned the status of African Studies
in South Africa. The collection consists of revised papers and discussions
presented at the conference as well as papers commissioned afterwards.
The editors' intention is to examine the state of African cultural studies
in South Africa from a variety of viewpoints and to highlight some of
the issues in contemporary theory and method that are debated among
Africanist scholars. Additionally, the pros and cons of eradicating
the boundaries between the traditional disciplines is discussed at length
by several of the contributors. In the introduction, the editors' note
that "African Studies" does not exist in South Africa as a discipline
per se, but rather, these "studies" span widely divergent departments
and disciplines. As a result, they are "situated within diverse politics,
language, theories and methodologies (p. 1)." This is a timely and interesting topic of discussion. South Africa's
political and social structures have changed profoundly in the past
few years, and the country's relationship with the rest of Africa has
changed as well. Unfortunately, Cooper and Steyn's understandable desire
to present a wide array of theoretical, methodological, and disciplinary
viewpoints diminishes the overall coherence of the book. One problem
is the definition of "African Studies." What is meant by this phrase
changes throughout the book depending upon the author. For example,
most of the contributors use the term to refer to South African cultural
studies undertaken in South Africa, but when filmmaker Haile Gerima
discusses "African cinema," he uses the term in the broadest sense.
A related problem with the collection is the lack of coherence that
results from presenting such a diverse array of subjects: the essays
included range from lucid discussions of contemporary theory in the
social sciences to movie reviews. The book's structure, however, is
not entirely without merit. In certain instances, the editors have wisely
chosen to maintain the conference-like format in which critics respond
to specific articles. This a useful way to present the larger theoretical
and methodological debates discussed, as both the major issues that
are in dispute are elucidated. Additionally, this method reveals the
difficulty of taking different theoretical viewpoints and disciplinary
backgrounds and bringing them to bear on an inherently broad and diverse
field such as area studies. The book is divided into three main sections. The first, entitled "Mapping
the Field," deals with the theoretical issues that are raised in contemporary
African studies, especially in the South African context. The discussions
primarily revolve around current debates about the applications of post-modernism
and Marxism as theoretical models. Although there is considerable difference
of opinion on specific issues, particularly regarding the utility of
boundaries between the disciplines, the three authors featured in this
section (Lovell, Bundy, and Comaroff) all agree that some rapprochement
between Marxism and post-modernist approaches to cultural studies is
necessary to further the field. Each author stresses the importance
of recognizing both the "subject positions" (to use Comaroff's terminology)
of the individuals studied and the effects of techno-economic and environmental
factors on culture. Each author recognizes that neither cultural relativism
nor "totalizing" reductionist paradigms are sufficiently able to explain
human behavior, however, this can hardly be considered a "new direction"
in the study of culture in Africa or anywhere else. American anthropology
has been fraught with variations of the "idealist" v. "materialist"
debate for decades. The second and largest section is comprised of a diverse collection
of what the editors call "case studies." The material presented here
includes two examples of colonial discourse analysis on descriptions
of indigenous South African poison, as well as an informative discussion
and debate about the symbolic significance of the Lydenburg heads (South
African terracotta sculptures from the sixth century AD, one of which
is depicted on the University of Cape Town's Centre for African Studies
letter-head). The latter involves an archaeologist (Martin Hall), a
museum curator (Patricia Davison), and an artist (Malcolm Payne), all
of whom have worked with the sculptures. This is "Transgressing Boundaries"
at its best: the debate between these three contributors elucidates
some of the conflicts and the benefits that result from cross-disciplinary
studies. Furthermore, the authors explicitly place the subject in the
context of contemporary South Africa. Other case-studies have little to do with the status of African studies
in South Africa, except insofar as they apply to African studies undertaken
anywhere. These include a personal statement from Ethiopian filmmaker
Haile Gerima, two reviews of his film about slavery, "Sankofa", and
an essay about the depiction of Africa's slave past in contemporary
West African literature. Among other things, these articles delve into
essentialist approaches to African studies, approaches that the editors'
clearly reject. Apparently, the focus on the subject of slavery and
the subsequent discussion of African essentialism were unintended consequences
of a screening of "Sankofa" at the 1993 conference (p. 164). Despite
the interesting subject matter, this group of case studies seems inappropriate
for the collection, as they contribute almost nothing to the reader's
understanding of the state of African studies in South Africa. The final section is intended to tie some of the book's loose ends
together, and to present possible future directions for African Studies.
In a concluding article, Brenda Cooper discusses the representation
of slavery in the fiction of Sierra-Leonian author Syl Cheney-Coker
in the context of "the theoretical paradigm of the reconstituted Marxism,
as proposed by Bundy [in Part One] (p. 11)." She proposes an approach
to African studies that she summarizes as follows: "...it investigates
Africa's position globally; it is both interdisciplinary but also takes
as its boundary of investigation a broadly defined cultural studies;
it is standpoint knowledge, committed politically to the oppressed;
in an African environment where cultural nationalism that relies on
myths of origins and essences is very powerful, the history of iniquities
of racism has to be formulated in terms of a reconstituted Marxism that
can think structurally and globally. It must, however, in speaking holistically,
deal with global realities and totalities, while not marginalising non-class
realities and while recognizing and celebrating, humour, magic, the
unpredictable and idiosyncratic, all of which holistic thinking demands
(p.183)" What Cooper is describing here is a platonic concept that exists
only in the realm of ideas. She does not disclose the means by which
one can expect to achieve this perfect result, nor do either of the
other two concluding essays contain a proposed solution to the problem
of African cultural studies as outlined in the introduction. As a result,
Cooper and Steyn's main achievement in presenting these essays as a
collection is that to expose the utter confusion and directionlessness
that pervades contemporary cultural studies. Kristen Jacobson |